Skill Challenges - Revision history

Andi at 17:28, 24 August 2025

2025-08-24T17:28:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:28, 24 August 2025
Line 116:		Line 116:
	\| +4		\| +4
	\|}		\|}
			''*Updated to Print 2''

Andi at 17:15, 24 August 2025

2025-08-24T17:15:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:15, 24 August 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	__NOAUTOLINKS__		__NOAUTOLINKS__
	~~When one of your players attempts something that has a chance of failure, ask them for an Attribute check to determine their level of success.~~

	~~Ask for~~ one of ~~seven Attribute checks: STR~~, ~~DEX, END, AWR, INT, CHA, or LUCK. These correspond~~ to ~~the seven Attributes~~ of ~~the same name (note that there are not COR checks)~~.		When one of your players attempts something that has a chance of failure, ask them for an attribute check to determine their level of success.

	~~To make a skill check~~, ~~your player will roll 1d20 and add their Attribute points from~~ the ~~relevant Attribute~~.		Ask for one of seven attribute checks: STR, DEX, END, AWR, INT, CHA, or LUCK. These correspond to the seven attributes of the same name (note that there are not COR checks).

	Encourage players to mention if they have a relevant skill. This would allow them to make their check with an added bonus.		To make an attribute check, your player will roll 1d20 and add their Attribute Points from the relevant attribute. Encourage players to mention if they have a relevant skill. This would allow them to make their check with an added bonus.<blockquote>For example, assume that Marcus is level 1. If the MC asks Marcus to make a Charisma roll to convince a local official to offer aid, then Marcus would roll 1d20 + his CHA, or 1d20+2. However, Marcus also has +3 in the Persuading skill, so he could remind the MC of this and make the roll at +5 instead: +2 from his Charisma, and +3 from his Persuading bonus.</blockquote>Players can use attribute checks and skills to attempt all manner of actions, from spreading rumors in a tavern to sneaking through a dungeon to foraging for food in the woods.

	For example, assume that Marcus is level 1. If the MC asks Marcus to make a Charisma roll to convince a local official to offer aid, then Marcus would roll 1d20 + his CHA, or 1d20+2. However, Marcus also has +3 in the Persuading skill, so he could remind the MC of this and make the roll at +5 instead: +2 from his Charisma, and +3 from his Persuading bonus.

	Players can use ~~Attribute~~ checks and skills to attempt all manner of actions, from spreading rumors in a tavern to sneaking through a dungeon to foraging for food in the woods.

	== Setting Difficulty ==		== Setting Difficulty ==
	As an MC, when you consider how difficult an ~~Attribute~~ should be, use these guiding principles and adopt them to the specific circumstance in question.		As an MC, when you consider how difficult an attribute check should be, use these guiding principles and adopt them to the specific circumstance in question.

	=== Tiered Success ===		=== Tiered Success ===
	It is narratively rewarding to set up an ~~Attribute Check~~ with different tiers of success. Using the above example, if Marcus is attempting to persuade a local official to lend aid to the party, then perhaps there are four possible outcomes, depending on how high Marcus rolls:		It is narratively rewarding to set up an attribute check with different tiers of success. Using the above example, if Marcus is attempting to persuade a local official to lend aid to the party, then perhaps there are four possible outcomes, depending on how high Marcus rolls:

	~~1. The official might ignore Marcus and refuse even basic help (outright failure).~~

	2. Perhaps, the official will listen to the heroes and then redirect them: “Not my problem; go talk to the sheriff.” This would be considered a failure in that the official did not lend aid, but not a complete failure; the official offered a lead for the party to pursue.

	~~3. With a more positive outcome, the official might lend financial aid.~~

	4. The official might even give the heroes a formal writ that lets them act with the official’s legal blessing, giving them more access throughout the city.		# The official might ignore Marcus and refuse even basic help (outright failure).
			# Perhaps, the official will listen to the heroes and then redirect them: “Not my problem; go talk to the sheriff.” This would be considered a failure in that the official did not lend aid, but not a complete failure; the official offered a lead for the party to pursue.
			# With a more positive outcome, the official might lend financial aid.
			# The official might even give the heroes a formal writ that lets them act with the official’s legal blessing, giving them more access throughout the city.

	=== Failing Forward ===		=== Failing Forward ===
	When designing ~~a skill~~ check, it is important to keep in mind that even failure should lead to progression in the story. For example, if characters are trying to sneak into an enemy stronghold, then failure might lead to [[combat]]; this still moves the story forward in a meaningful way.		When designing an attribute check, it is important to keep in mind that even failure should lead to progression in the story. <blockquote>For example, if characters are trying to sneak into an enemy stronghold, then failure might lead to combat; this still moves the story forward in a meaningful way.

	Conversely, if characters must find a secret room in an old manor, and they all fail on their AWR checks to do so, it could grind the story to a halt. In [[order]] to prevent this, make sure that every outright failure leads to another potential course of action. Failing their AWR checks might mean that the characters DO still find the secret room, but it takes them so long that the manor’s cultist inhabitants return home and confront them… or perhaps a rival explorer finds a different way into the secret room first and steals the artifact the heroes were looking for.		Conversely, if characters must find a secret room in an old manor, and they all fail on their AWR checks to do so, it could grind the story to a halt. In order to prevent this, make sure that every outright failure leads to another potential course of action.

	There will, of course, be the rare instance in which failure is just failure - provided that it does not lead to an outright dead end in the story’s progression. In the example of the manor’s hidden room, perhaps the heroes are investigating a larger mystery throughout the town. Just because they ~~can’t~~ find a hidden room in the manor does not mean that they ~~can’t~~ keep pursuing other leads.		Failing their AWR checks might mean that the characters DO still find the secret room, but it takes them so long that the manor’s cultist inhabitants return home and confront them... or perhaps a rival explorer finds a different way into the secret room first and steals the artifact the heroes were looking for. </blockquote>There will, of course, be the rare instance in which failure is just failure – provided that it does not lead to an outright dead end in the story’s progression. In the example of the manor’s hidden room, perhaps the heroes are investigating a larger mystery throughout the town. Just because they cannot find a hidden room in the manor does not mean that they cannot keep pursuing other leads.

	=== Difficulty Rating ===		=== Difficulty Rating ===
	Here are some guidelines that you can use when determining the difficulty rating of ~~a skill~~ check. You can use these guidelines to set different tiers of success; for example, outright failure might be a roll of 5 or less; failure with some consolation might be a roll of 6-9; success, a roll of 10- 15; and fantastic success with a best-case-scenario outcome if you roll 16 or higher. These numbers should change dramatically based on the difficulty of the task undertaken		Here are some guidelines that you can use when determining the difficulty rating of an attribute check. You can use these guidelines to set different tiers of success; for example, outright failure might be a roll of 5 or less; failure with some consolation might be a roll of 6-9; success, a roll of 10-15; and fantastic success with a best-case-scenario outcome if you roll 16 or higher. These numbers should change dramatically based on the difficulty of the task undertaken.

	Remember that ~~skill~~ checks should only be made if there is a chance of failure. Finding food in an in-season orchard, for example, is a given and should not require ~~a skill~~ check.		Remember that attribute checks should only be made if there is a chance of failure. Finding food in an in-season orchard, for example, is a given and should not require an attribute check.

	Note that adventurers can gain up to a +12 in an ~~Attribute~~ (though they cannot get a +12 before level 21 due to the restrictions in how quickly you can gain Attribute ~~points~~), and can get up to a +20 in a ~~Skill~~ if they focus on really becoming an expert in it.		Note that adventurers can gain up to a +12 in an attribute (though they cannot get a +12 before level 21 due to the restrictions in how quickly you can gain Attribute Points), and can get up to a +20 in a skill if they focus on really becoming an expert in it.

	This means that by level 21, a character might have a +32 in a Specialized Skill, meaning that a high-level expert could automatically succeed a very hard check, but would need to roll a 15 or higher on a near-impossible check.		This means that by level 21, a character might have a +32 in a Specialized Skill, meaning that a high-level expert could automatically succeed a very hard check, but would need to roll a 15 or higher on a near-impossible check.
Line 81:		Line 73:

	== Example Skill Challenges ==		== Example Skill Challenges ==
	Here are a couple situations where you might ask your party to make some ~~skill~~ checks. The ~~Difficulties~~ in these examples assume a party of four ~~Adventurers~~ that are all ~~level~~ 3 or lower.		Here are a couple situations where you might ask your party to make some attribute checks. The difficulties in these examples assume a party of four adventurers that are all 3 or lower.

	'''Rumors of ~~bandits~~'''		'''Rumors of Bandits'''

	The heroes have heard that there is a roving pack of bandits in the area, so they take it upon themselves to investigate. In order to quickly find the bandit group, the adventurers need to ask traveling merchants and local farmers and hunters if ~~they’ve~~ gotten word of the bandits or seen anything suspicious of late.		The heroes have heard that there is a roving pack of bandits in the area, so they take it upon themselves to investigate. In order to quickly find the bandit group, the adventurers need to ask traveling merchants and local farmers and hunters if they have gotten word of the bandits or seen anything suspicious of late.

	The adventurers can make CHA or INT checks to gain more information on them. If the heroes have the relevant ~~Skills~~, they might want to add their Eavesdropping, Gossiping, Intimidating, Persuading, or Savoir Faire bonuses.		The adventurers can make CHA or INT checks to gain more information on them. If the heroes have the relevant skills, they might want to add their Eavesdropping, Gossiping, Intimidating, Persuading, or Savoir Faire bonuses.

	Each PC can make a check. They gain Successes based on the table ~~below~~		Each PC can make a check. They gain Successes based on the following table.

	If the heroes collectively get fewer than 4 Successes, then when they find the group of bandits, the bandits have had time to recruit more members. Add 2 additional bandits to the encounter		If the heroes collectively get fewer than 4 Successes, then when they find the group of bandits, the bandits have had time to recruit more members. Add 2 additional bandits to the encounter.

	Conversely, if the adventurers collectively get more than 6 successes, then when they find the bandit group, run the battle with one fewer bandit as the group has realized that they are being investigated and one of their less committed members decided to abandon them		Conversely, if the adventurers collectively get more than 6 successes, then when they find the bandit group, run the battle with one fewer bandit as the group has realized that they are being investigated and one of their less committed members decided to abandon them.

	'''Wilderness Survival'''		'''Wilderness Survival'''
Line 99:		Line 91:
	When the heroes try to camp, they can roll AWR checks to try to make camp. They might add Foraging or Sheltering bonuses.		When the heroes try to camp, they can roll AWR checks to try to make camp. They might add Foraging or Sheltering bonuses.

	Each PC can make a check, gaining ~~“Successes”~~ based on the table below.		Each PC can make a check, gaining Successes based on the table below.

	If the adventurers collectively get fewer than 5 Successes, then they each start the following day by subtracting 1d4 from their current HP (representing a malnourished and uncomfortable night of sleep).		If the adventurers collectively get fewer than 5 Successes, then they each start the following day by subtracting 1d4 from their current HP (representing a malnourished and uncomfortable night of sleep).

Makiaka at 19:09, 15 October 2024

2024-10-15T19:09:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:09, 15 October 2024
Line 87:		Line 87:
	The heroes have heard that there is a roving pack of bandits in the area, so they take it upon themselves to investigate. In order to quickly find the bandit group, the adventurers need to ask traveling merchants and local farmers and hunters if they’ve gotten word of the bandits or seen anything suspicious of late.		The heroes have heard that there is a roving pack of bandits in the area, so they take it upon themselves to investigate. In order to quickly find the bandit group, the adventurers need to ask traveling merchants and local farmers and hunters if they’ve gotten word of the bandits or seen anything suspicious of late.

	The adventurers can make CHA or INT checks to gain more information on them. If the heroes have the relevant Skills, they might want to add their Eavesdropping, ~~Gossipping~~, Intimidating, Persuading, or Savoir Faire bonuses.		The adventurers can make CHA or INT checks to gain more information on them. If the heroes have the relevant Skills, they might want to add their Eavesdropping, Gossiping, Intimidating, Persuading, or Savoir Faire bonuses.

	Each PC can make a check. They gain Successes based on the table below		Each PC can make a check. They gain Successes based on the table below

Makiaka at 11:17, 30 September 2024

2024-09-30T11:17:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:17, 30 September 2024
Line 13:		Line 13:

	== Setting Difficulty ==		== Setting Difficulty ==
	As an MC, when you consider how difficult an Attribute should be, use these [[guiding principles]] and adopt them to the specific circumstance in question.		As an MC, when you consider how difficult an Attribute should be, use these guiding principles and adopt them to the specific circumstance in question.

	=== Tiered Success ===		=== Tiered Success ===

Makiaka at 11:16, 30 September 2024

2024-09-30T11:16:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:16, 30 September 2024
Line 51:		Line 51:
	\|Swimming across a narrow lake without much current.		\|Swimming across a narrow lake without much current.
	\|-		\|-
	\|~~easy~~		\|Easy
	\|8		\|8
	\|Sneaking past guards that have fallen asleep		\|Sneaking past guards that have fallen asleep
Line 61:		Line 61:
	\|Difficult		\|Difficult
	\|17		\|17
	\|Persuading a political enemy ~~tol~~ team up for a shared goal		\|Persuading a political enemy to team up for a shared goal
	\|-		\|-
	\|Hard		\|Hard
Line 75:		Line 75:
	\|Pushing a large boulder up a hill		\|Pushing a large boulder up a hill
	\|-		\|-
	\|~~NearImpossible~~		\|Near Impossible
	\|47		\|47
	\|Outwitting an archfiend		\|Outwitting an archfiend

Andi at 18:05, 31 July 2024

2024-07-31T18:05:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:05, 31 July 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~=== Skill Challenges ===~~		__NOAUTOLINKS__
	When one of your players attempts something that has a chance of failure, ask them for an Attribute check to determine their level of success.		When one of your players attempts something that has a chance of failure, ask them for an Attribute check to determine their level of success.

	Ask for one of seven Attribute checks: STR, DEX, END, AWR, INT, CHA, or LUCK. These correspond to the seven [[Attributes]] of the same name (note that there are not COR checks).		Ask for one of seven Attribute checks: STR, DEX, END, AWR, INT, CHA, or LUCK. These correspond to the seven Attributes of the same name (note that there are not COR checks).

	To make a skill check, your player will roll 1d20 and add their Attribute points from the relevant Attribute.		To make a skill check, your player will roll 1d20 and add their Attribute points from the relevant Attribute.
Line 10:		Line 10:
	For example, assume that Marcus is level 1. If the MC asks Marcus to make a Charisma roll to convince a local official to offer aid, then Marcus would roll 1d20 + his CHA, or 1d20+2. However, Marcus also has +3 in the Persuading skill, so he could remind the MC of this and make the roll at +5 instead: +2 from his Charisma, and +3 from his Persuading bonus.		For example, assume that Marcus is level 1. If the MC asks Marcus to make a Charisma roll to convince a local official to offer aid, then Marcus would roll 1d20 + his CHA, or 1d20+2. However, Marcus also has +3 in the Persuading skill, so he could remind the MC of this and make the roll at +5 instead: +2 from his Charisma, and +3 from his Persuading bonus.

	Players can use Attribute checks and [[skills]] to attempt all manner of [[actions]], from spreading rumors in a tavern to sneaking through a dungeon to foraging for food in the woods.		Players can use Attribute checks and skills to attempt all manner of actions, from spreading rumors in a tavern to sneaking through a dungeon to foraging for food in the woods.

	==== Setting Difficulty ====		== Setting Difficulty ==
	As an MC, when you consider how difficult an Attribute should be, use these [[~~Guiding Principles\|~~guiding principles]] and adopt them to the specific circumstance in question.		As an MC, when you consider how difficult an Attribute should be, use these [[guiding principles]] and adopt them to the specific circumstance in question.

	==== Tiered Success ====		=== Tiered Success ===
	It is narratively rewarding to set up an Attribute Check with different tiers of success. Using the above example, if Marcus is attempting to persuade a local official to lend aid to the party, then perhaps there are four possible outcomes, depending on how high Marcus rolls:		It is narratively rewarding to set up an Attribute Check with different tiers of success. Using the above example, if Marcus is attempting to persuade a local official to lend aid to the party, then perhaps there are four possible outcomes, depending on how high Marcus rolls:

Line 26:		Line 26:
	4. The official might even give the heroes a formal writ that lets them act with the official’s legal blessing, giving them more access throughout the city.		4. The official might even give the heroes a formal writ that lets them act with the official’s legal blessing, giving them more access throughout the city.

	==== Failing Forward ====		=== Failing Forward ===
	When designing a skill check, it is important to keep in mind that even failure should lead to progression in the story. For example, if characters are trying to sneak into an enemy stronghold, then failure might lead to [[combat]]; this still moves the story forward in a meaningful way.		When designing a skill check, it is important to keep in mind that even failure should lead to progression in the story. For example, if characters are trying to sneak into an enemy stronghold, then failure might lead to [[combat]]; this still moves the story forward in a meaningful way.

Line 80:		Line 80:
	\|}		\|}

	=== Example Skill Challenges ===		== Example Skill Challenges ==
	Here are a couple situations where you might ask your party to make some skill checks. The Difficulties in these examples assume a party of four Adventurers that are all level 3 or lower.		Here are a couple situations where you might ask your party to make some skill checks. The Difficulties in these examples assume a party of four Adventurers that are all level 3 or lower.

	~~====~~ Rumors of bandits ~~====~~		'''Rumors of bandits'''
	The heroes have heard that there is a roving pack of bandits in the area, so they take it upon themselves to investigate. In order to quickly find the [[bandit]] group, the adventurers need to ask traveling merchants and local farmers and hunters if they’ve gotten word of the bandits or seen anything suspicious of late.
			The heroes have heard that there is a roving pack of bandits in the area, so they take it upon themselves to investigate. In order to quickly find the bandit group, the adventurers need to ask traveling merchants and local farmers and hunters if they’ve gotten word of the bandits or seen anything suspicious of late.

	The adventurers can make CHA or INT checks to gain more information on them. If the heroes have the relevant Skills, they might want to add their Eavesdropping, Gossipping, Intimidating, Persuading, or Savoir Faire bonuses.		The adventurers can make CHA or INT checks to gain more information on them. If the heroes have the relevant Skills, they might want to add their Eavesdropping, Gossipping, Intimidating, Persuading, or Savoir Faire bonuses.
Line 94:		Line 95:
	Conversely, if the adventurers collectively get more than 6 successes, then when they find the bandit group, run the battle with one fewer bandit as the group has realized that they are being investigated and one of their less committed members decided to abandon them		Conversely, if the adventurers collectively get more than 6 successes, then when they find the bandit group, run the battle with one fewer bandit as the group has realized that they are being investigated and one of their less committed members decided to abandon them

	~~====~~ Wilderness Survival ~~====~~		'''Wilderness Survival'''

	When the heroes try to camp, they can roll AWR checks to try to make camp. They might add Foraging or Sheltering bonuses.		When the heroes try to camp, they can roll AWR checks to try to make camp. They might add Foraging or Sheltering bonuses.

Self-Help: Just corrected some minor spelling changes - "ease" to "easy" in the difficulty chart; "bandets" to "bandits" in the Example Skill Challenges area, and "Wildernes" to "Wilderness" in the same section.

2024-01-06T15:26:03Z

Just corrected some minor spelling changes - "ease" to "easy" in the difficulty chart; "bandets" to "bandits" in the Example Skill Challenges area, and "Wildernes" to "Wilderness" in the same section.

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:26, 6 January 2024
Line 51:		Line 51:
	\|Swimming across a narrow lake without much current.		\|Swimming across a narrow lake without much current.
	\|-		\|-
	\|~~ease~~		\|easy
	\|8		\|8
	\|Sneaking past guards that have fallen asleep		\|Sneaking past guards that have fallen asleep
Line 69:		Line 69:
	\|Very Hard		\|Very Hard
	\|30		\|30
	\|Spotting an ~~invisavle~~ Enemy		\|Spotting an invisible Enemy
	\|-		\|-
	\|Strenuous		\|Strenuous
Line 83:		Line 83:
	Here are a couple situations where you might ask your party to make some skill checks. The Difficulties in these examples assume a party of four Adventurers that are all level 3 or lower.		Here are a couple situations where you might ask your party to make some skill checks. The Difficulties in these examples assume a party of four Adventurers that are all level 3 or lower.

	==== Rumors of ~~bandets~~ ====		==== Rumors of bandits ====
	The heroes have heard that there is a roving pack of bandits in the area, so they take it upon themselves to investigate. In order to quickly find the [[bandit]] group, the adventurers need to ask traveling merchants and local farmers and hunters if they’ve gotten word of the bandits or seen anything suspicious of late.		The heroes have heard that there is a roving pack of bandits in the area, so they take it upon themselves to investigate. In order to quickly find the [[bandit]] group, the adventurers need to ask traveling merchants and local farmers and hunters if they’ve gotten word of the bandits or seen anything suspicious of late.

Line 94:		Line 94:
	Conversely, if the adventurers collectively get more than 6 successes, then when they find the bandit group, run the battle with one fewer bandit as the group has realized that they are being investigated and one of their less committed members decided to abandon them		Conversely, if the adventurers collectively get more than 6 successes, then when they find the bandit group, run the battle with one fewer bandit as the group has realized that they are being investigated and one of their less committed members decided to abandon them

	==== ~~Wildernes~~ Survival ====		==== Wilderness Survival ====
	When the heroes try to camp, they can roll AWR checks to try to make camp. They might add Foraging or Sheltering bonuses.		When the heroes try to camp, they can roll AWR checks to try to make camp. They might add Foraging or Sheltering bonuses.

Spazztaztic: Format Subheadings

2023-12-20T02:53:49Z

Format Subheadings

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:53, 19 December 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Skill Challenges		=== Skill Challenges ===

	When one of your players attempts something that has a chance of failure, ask them for an Attribute check to determine their level of success.		When one of your players attempts something that has a chance of failure, ask them for an Attribute check to determine their level of success.

Line 13:		Line 12:
	Players can use Attribute checks and [[skills]] to attempt all manner of [[actions]], from spreading rumors in a tavern to sneaking through a dungeon to foraging for food in the woods.		Players can use Attribute checks and [[skills]] to attempt all manner of [[actions]], from spreading rumors in a tavern to sneaking through a dungeon to foraging for food in the woods.

	Setting Difficulty		==== Setting Difficulty ====

	As an MC, when you consider how difficult an Attribute should be, use these [[Guiding Principles\|guiding principles]] and adopt them to the specific circumstance in question.		As an MC, when you consider how difficult an Attribute should be, use these [[Guiding Principles\|guiding principles]] and adopt them to the specific circumstance in question.

	Tiered Success		==== Tiered Success ====

	It is narratively rewarding to set up an Attribute Check with different tiers of success. Using the above example, if Marcus is attempting to persuade a local official to lend aid to the party, then perhaps there are four possible outcomes, depending on how high Marcus rolls:		It is narratively rewarding to set up an Attribute Check with different tiers of success. Using the above example, if Marcus is attempting to persuade a local official to lend aid to the party, then perhaps there are four possible outcomes, depending on how high Marcus rolls:

Line 29:		Line 26:
	4. The official might even give the heroes a formal writ that lets them act with the official’s legal blessing, giving them more access throughout the city.		4. The official might even give the heroes a formal writ that lets them act with the official’s legal blessing, giving them more access throughout the city.

	Failing Forward		==== Failing Forward ====

	When designing a skill check, it is important to keep in mind that even failure should lead to progression in the story. For example, if characters are trying to sneak into an enemy stronghold, then failure might lead to [[combat]]; this still moves the story forward in a meaningful way.		When designing a skill check, it is important to keep in mind that even failure should lead to progression in the story. For example, if characters are trying to sneak into an enemy stronghold, then failure might lead to [[combat]]; this still moves the story forward in a meaningful way.

Line 37:		Line 33:
	There will, of course, be the rare instance in which failure is just failure - provided that it does not lead to an outright dead end in the story’s progression. In the example of the manor’s hidden room, perhaps the heroes are investigating a larger mystery throughout the town. Just because they can’t find a hidden room in the manor does not mean that they can’t keep pursuing other leads.		There will, of course, be the rare instance in which failure is just failure - provided that it does not lead to an outright dead end in the story’s progression. In the example of the manor’s hidden room, perhaps the heroes are investigating a larger mystery throughout the town. Just because they can’t find a hidden room in the manor does not mean that they can’t keep pursuing other leads.

	~~D I F F I C U LT Y R AT I N G~~		=== Difficulty Rating ===

	Here are some guidelines that you can use when determining the difficulty rating of a skill check. You can use these guidelines to set different tiers of success; for example, outright failure might be a roll of 5 or less; failure with some consolation might be a roll of 6-9; success, a roll of 10- 15; and fantastic success with a best-case-scenario outcome if you roll 16 or higher. These numbers should change dramatically based on the difficulty of the task undertaken		Here are some guidelines that you can use when determining the difficulty rating of a skill check. You can use these guidelines to set different tiers of success; for example, outright failure might be a roll of 5 or less; failure with some consolation might be a roll of 6-9; success, a roll of 10- 15; and fantastic success with a best-case-scenario outcome if you roll 16 or higher. These numbers should change dramatically based on the difficulty of the task undertaken

Line 84:		Line 79:
	\|Outwitting an archfiend		\|Outwitting an archfiend
	\|}		\|}
	~~Example Skill Challenges~~

			=== Example Skill Challenges ===
	Here are a couple situations where you might ask your party to make some skill checks. The Difficulties in these examples assume a party of four Adventurers that are all level 3 or lower.		Here are a couple situations where you might ask your party to make some skill checks. The Difficulties in these examples assume a party of four Adventurers that are all level 3 or lower.

	Rumors of bandets		==== Rumors of bandets ====

	The heroes have heard that there is a roving pack of bandits in the area, so they take it upon themselves to investigate. In order to quickly find the [[bandit]] group, the adventurers need to ask traveling merchants and local farmers and hunters if they’ve gotten word of the bandits or seen anything suspicious of late.		The heroes have heard that there is a roving pack of bandits in the area, so they take it upon themselves to investigate. In order to quickly find the [[bandit]] group, the adventurers need to ask traveling merchants and local farmers and hunters if they’ve gotten word of the bandits or seen anything suspicious of late.

Line 100:		Line 94:
	Conversely, if the adventurers collectively get more than 6 successes, then when they find the bandit group, run the battle with one fewer bandit as the group has realized that they are being investigated and one of their less committed members decided to abandon them		Conversely, if the adventurers collectively get more than 6 successes, then when they find the bandit group, run the battle with one fewer bandit as the group has realized that they are being investigated and one of their less committed members decided to abandon them

	Wildernes Survival		==== Wildernes Survival ====

	When the heroes try to camp, they can roll AWR checks to try to make camp. They might add Foraging or Sheltering bonuses.		When the heroes try to camp, they can roll AWR checks to try to make camp. They might add Foraging or Sheltering bonuses.

Spazztaztic at 17:34, 3 December 2023

2023-12-03T17:34:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:34, 3 December 2023
Line 15:		Line 15:
	Setting Difficulty		Setting Difficulty

	As an MC, when you consider how difficult an Attribute should be, use these guiding principles and adopt them to the specific circumstance in question.		As an MC, when you consider how difficult an Attribute should be, use these [[Guiding Principles\|guiding principles]] and adopt them to the specific circumstance in question.

	Tiered Success		Tiered Success
Line 99:		Line 99:

	Conversely, if the adventurers collectively get more than 6 successes, then when they find the bandit group, run the battle with one fewer bandit as the group has realized that they are being investigated and one of their less committed members decided to abandon them		Conversely, if the adventurers collectively get more than 6 successes, then when they find the bandit group, run the battle with one fewer bandit as the group has realized that they are being investigated and one of their less committed members decided to abandon them

			Wildernes Survival

			When the heroes try to camp, they can roll AWR checks to try to make camp. They might add Foraging or Sheltering bonuses.

			Each PC can make a check, gaining “Successes” based on the table below.

			If the adventurers collectively get fewer than 5 Successes, then they each start the following day by subtracting 1d4 from their current HP (representing a malnourished and uncomfortable night of sleep).
	{\| class="wikitable"		{\| class="wikitable"
	!Skill Roll		!Skill Roll

Spazztaztic: Created page with "Skill Challenges When one of your players attempts something that has a chance of failure, ask them for an Attribute check to determine their level of success. Ask for one of seven Attribute checks: STR, DEX, END, AWR, INT, CHA, or LUCK. These correspond to the seven Attributes of the same name (note that there are not COR checks). To make a skill check, your player will roll 1d20 and add their Attribute points from the relevant Attribute. Encourage players to men..."

2023-12-03T17:33:05Z

Created page with "Skill Challenges When one of your players attempts something that has a chance of failure, ask them for an Attribute check to determine their level of success. Ask for one of seven Attribute checks: STR, DEX, END, AWR, INT, CHA, or LUCK. These correspond to the seven Attributes of the same name (note that there are not COR checks). To make a skill check, your player will roll 1d20 and add their Attribute points from the relevant Attribute. Encourage players to men..."

New page

Skill Challenges

When one of your players attempts something that has a chance of failure, ask them for an Attribute check to determine their level of success.

Ask for one of seven Attribute checks: STR, DEX, END, AWR, INT, CHA, or LUCK. These correspond to the seven [[Attributes]] of the same name (note that there are not COR checks).

To make a skill check, your player will roll 1d20 and add their Attribute points from the relevant Attribute.

Encourage players to mention if they have a relevant skill. This would allow them to make their check with an added bonus.

For example, assume that Marcus is level 1. If the MC asks Marcus to make a Charisma roll to convince a local official to offer aid, then Marcus would roll 1d20 + his CHA, or 1d20+2. However, Marcus also has +3 in the Persuading skill, so he could remind the MC of this and make the roll at +5 instead: +2 from his Charisma, and +3 from his Persuading bonus.

Players can use Attribute checks and [[skills]] to attempt all manner of [[actions]], from spreading rumors in a tavern to sneaking through a dungeon to foraging for food in the woods.

Setting Difficulty

As an MC, when you consider how difficult an Attribute should be, use these guiding principles and adopt them to the specific circumstance in question.

Tiered Success

It is narratively rewarding to set up an Attribute Check with different tiers of success. Using the above example, if Marcus is attempting to persuade a local official to lend aid to the party, then perhaps there are four possible outcomes, depending on how high Marcus rolls:

1. The official might ignore Marcus and refuse even basic help (outright failure).

2. Perhaps, the official will listen to the heroes and then redirect them: “Not my problem; go talk to the sheriff.” This would be considered a failure in that the official did not lend aid, but not a complete failure; the official offered a lead for the party to pursue.

3. With a more positive outcome, the official might lend financial aid.

4. The official might even give the heroes a formal writ that lets them act with the official’s legal blessing, giving them more access throughout the city.

Failing Forward

When designing a skill check, it is important to keep in mind that even failure should lead to progression in the story. For example, if characters are trying to sneak into an enemy stronghold, then failure might lead to [[combat]]; this still moves the story forward in a meaningful way.

Conversely, if characters must find a secret room in an old manor, and they all fail on their AWR checks to do so, it could grind the story to a halt. In [[order]] to prevent this, make sure that every outright failure leads to another potential course of action. Failing their AWR checks might mean that the characters DO still find the secret room, but it takes them so long that the manor’s cultist inhabitants return home and confront them… or perhaps a rival explorer finds a different way into the secret room first and steals the artifact the heroes were looking for.

There will, of course, be the rare instance in which failure is just failure - provided that it does not lead to an outright dead end in the story’s progression. In the example of the manor’s hidden room, perhaps the heroes are investigating a larger mystery throughout the town. Just because they can’t find a hidden room in the manor does not mean that they can’t keep pursuing other leads.

D I F F I C U LT Y R AT I N G

Here are some guidelines that you can use when determining the difficulty rating of a skill check. You can use these guidelines to set different tiers of success; for example, outright failure might be a roll of 5 or less; failure with some consolation might be a roll of 6-9; success, a roll of 10- 15; and fantastic success with a best-case-scenario outcome if you roll 16 or higher. These numbers should change dramatically based on the difficulty of the task undertaken

Remember that skill checks should only be made if there is a chance of failure. Finding food in an in-season orchard, for example, is a given and should not require a skill check.

Note that adventurers can gain up to a +12 in an Attribute (though they cannot get a +12 before level 21 due to the restrictions in how quickly you can gain Attribute points), and can get up to a +20 in a Skill if they focus on really becoming an expert in it.

This means that by level 21, a character might have a +32 in a Specialized Skill, meaning that a high-level expert could automatically succeed a very hard check, but would need to roll a 15 or higher on a near-impossible check.
{| class="wikitable"
|+
!Difficulty
!Rating
!Example
|-
|Very easy
|5
|Swimming across a narrow lake without much current.
|-
|ease
|8
|Sneaking past guards that have fallen asleep
|-
|Intermediate
|12
|Climing a vertical cliff with rough edges, offering resonable handholds
|-
|Difficult
|17
|Persuading a political enemy tol team up for a shared goal
|-
|Hard
|23
|Determing cause of death on a very mangled corpse
|-
|Very Hard
|30
|Spotting an invisavle Enemy
|-
|Strenuous
|38
|Pushing a large boulder up a hill
|-
|NearImpossible
|47
|Outwitting an archfiend
|}
Example Skill Challenges

Here are a couple situations where you might ask your party to make some skill checks. The Difficulties in these examples assume a party of four Adventurers that are all level 3 or lower.

Rumors of bandets

The heroes have heard that there is a roving pack of bandits in the area, so they take it upon themselves to investigate. In order to quickly find the [[bandit]] group, the adventurers need to ask traveling merchants and local farmers and hunters if they’ve gotten word of the bandits or seen anything suspicious of late.

The adventurers can make CHA or INT checks to gain more information on them. If the heroes have the relevant Skills, they might want to add their Eavesdropping, Gossipping, Intimidating, Persuading, or Savoir Faire bonuses.

Each PC can make a check. They gain Successes based on the table below

If the heroes collectively get fewer than 4 Successes, then when they find the group of bandits, the bandits have had time to recruit more members. Add 2 additional bandits to the encounter

Conversely, if the adventurers collectively get more than 6 successes, then when they find the bandit group, run the battle with one fewer bandit as the group has realized that they are being investigated and one of their less committed members decided to abandon them
{| class="wikitable"
!Skill Roll
!Successes
|-
|Less then 5
| -1
|-
|5-8
|0
|-
|9-13
| +1
|-
|14-17
| +2
|-
|18-20
| +3
|-
|21 or more
| +4
|}